Originally published at: Broker liability at SCOTUS: judges debate meaning of ‘motor vehicles’ - FreightWaves
(Editor’s note: FreightWaves streamed news and commentary from the arguments before the Supreme Court in Montgomery vs. Caribe II earlier Wednesday. That can be found here). There was a stretch of questioning of Theodore Boutrous during ■■■■ arguments Wednesday before the U.S. Supreme Court on Montgomery vs. Caribe Transport II, the possibly groundbreaking case involving…
Brokers should be liable to an extent. Did they check CDL, reg, DOT status and insurance? If they didn’t, sure they deserve to be sued. But if they did, and the carrier is an “unsafe” driver, that’s on the carrier, plus why were they able to get insured, keep [or even obtain] their commercial license and lastly not put out of service by DOT? It’s too many moving parts to the guardrails to only hang brokers [unless they truly are negligent, hiring carriers without any checks], but in all cases the carrier is at the center of the problem and should hold the most liability. That carrier knows if they shouldn’t be behind a wheel. This is my opinion.
AI is programmed to sue every business until businesses don’t exist anymore. People walking around are saying Im an AI my AI is programmed to destroy America by suing using international law