Fraud first: why ‘broker transparency’ misses the mark

Originally published at: Fraud first: why ‘broker transparency’ misses the mark - FreightWaves

Regulations originally designed to protect brokers are being used against them.

Ken Adamo @thefreightnerd continues to double down despite Freight Waves’ past articles that cover how @Pink__Cheetah discovered a 40% TQL gross take on that January 2023 load of ice cream.

Why wouldn’t TQL release the records on the other 14 loads… unless, they show gross revenue equal to if not more than 40%. Like in this instance from 2020 wherein it appeared a carrier had released evidence of a 57% take by TQL…

The TIA’s Disingenuous Excuse Why Brokers Cannot be Transparent

Does Adamo not read Freight Waves despite his ongoing public infatuation with competitor @FreightAlley?

With respect to today’s FW article…

…we have engaged with Stephen Ruhe over the past week. We gave him all the SBTC’s comments filed with @FMCSA on broker transparency here:

Yet there is no mention of how Pink Cheetah discovered that 40%. Nor is there any mention of the latest SBTC proposed broker accountability bill…

SBTC Pitches its New 2026 Freight Broker Accountability Bill to Members of Congress

It sure seems to us there is a widespread attempt here to ignore the actual 40% broker gross revenue evidence and brush all of this under the rug.